The following is a transcript from the Pro America Report.
Welcome, welcome, welcome. Ed Martin here on the Pro America Report and very good to be with you. Thank you for coming and joining us. Please visit ProAmericaReport.com. Sign up there for the daily email, the WYNK, what you need to know, as well as you can see these great interviews, every interview we do, especially with every segment we do, but especially the interviews we make sure to post with an individual link. So you can just listen to that interview as well as as a podcast if you’re interested in what we’re talking about. And you say, hey, let me go find out more. You can go over to ProAmericaReport.com. It’ll kick to the PhyllisSchlafly.com universe, and there’s a lot of there there, so please check that out. Okay?
Today we’ve got some great discussions. In a few moments, we’ll talk with Stefano Gennarini who is over at C-Fam, the Center for Family and Human Rights. I think I got that right. C-fam.org, I know their website well. It’s really good. And they do he does a Friday fax that comes out every Friday. I assume it used to be a fax. Now it’s an email and it tells you a lot of what’s going on at the UN. He’s a conservative who, along with C-FAM and Austin Ruse, their fearless president, they watch what’s going on there. Well, they have identified that the Netherlands, which probably in your head sounds liberal, right? It’s got to be liberal. I think they got liberal drug laws. They probably have liberal laws on sexuality and sex trade. I think they do, but on certain issues, it sounds pretty like a human rights violation. And here’s the kicker, certainly for me and you, if you’re Prolife, they’ve got some really lax pro life laws excuse me, abortion laws, but also end of life. End of life. I believe we’re going to see more and more as this huge, huge gray tsunami comes through the baby boomers and beyond that are aging all over the world. So many people will live longer into their late seventies. Eighties. Nineties. And how we handle the end of life is going to say a lot about us. And so we’ll talk with Stefano Gennarini in a few moments.
Also, we’ll talk with Carrie Severino, right after the break here, after this segment. Carrie worked, clerked for Clarence Thomas. Justice Thomas. And she is the head of the Judicial Crisis Network. She’s a pretty amazing lady. She does a great job and is out there sort of as a public face saying, hey, wait a second, what about conservative judges? Hey, wait a second, what about protecting judges in this case? She’s got a poll out that says, hey, most Americans want less of this targeting of judges, justices, and she actually argues that we should see more leadership from the White House on this. So we’ll talk with her.
But first, what you need to know. And here’s what you need to know. This is really important and I’m really sorry this is where we are, but this is where we are.
And where we are is that they are hunting, they are hunting us.
And when I say that, I don’t say it lightly. They are hunting conservatives. They are hunting conservatives. And let me walk you through the last, just five months and show you what I mean. And then we can go back 20 months. Then we can go back five years. But first, let’s just go for five months.
They’re hunting conservatives. What do I mean?
They’re systematically looking for and trying to damage conservatives. So here’s the last five months. The Supreme Court leak that happens, clearly meant to embarrass, to put pressure on to, I don’t know, influence the Supreme Court horrendous leak. And what happens? All the attention goes to Supreme Court justices, right?
And very quickly, the question is, can someone convince these justices not to reverse Roe v. Wade? Doe v. Bolton and Casey versus Planned Parenthood. Pennsylvania, I guess. Pennsylvania versus Planned Parenthood. I always get that one wrong, the Casey case. And it culminates with someone flying across the country hoping to influence Justice Kavanaugh by murdering him. And his family shows up at his house with accoutrement, tools to be able to tie them up and kill them.
Now, one caused the other, and yet was there an outcry? I mean, there was some outcry among conservatives, for sure, but was there a wholesale outcry? No. In fact, you had people all over the country saying, hey, wait a second, what’s going on here? Because why? Because within weeks or days of the Kavanaugh assassination attempt, there were protests in front of the justices’ homes. Okay? And so in front of Amy Coney Barrett’s home, Justice Barrett, in front of Justice Kavanaugh’s home, in front of Justice Gorsuch’s home, Justice Alito, you get the point. The focus was on intimidation and targeting, physical targeting. Justice Kavanaugh then gets shouted at and shouted out of a restaurant. Now people say, oh, he had his meal without being inconvenienced. Trust me, the way it works is there’s security at the building, at the restaurant. And they would tell someone, hey, we got a situation where people are outside screaming and yelling. We think you’ve got it secure enough. You can finish. But we want you to be aware because something could happen. That’s what happens. It’s not exactly relaxed. You’re not exactly like, oh, good, I’ll pass the vino bianco.
No, this is the last five months. Next after that is you see the public attacking of Ginny Thomas. And they say, Ginny Thomas, who is the spouse of a Supreme Court justice, is not allowed to have a public opinion or a private opinion. It’s not allowed to have a job if it doesn’t coincide with what they want. There are plenty of judges that are liberal whose spouse is a law professor or is working as an activist. There are people right now, the US attorney for the District of Columbia, his wife is a prominent left wing activist. I think she’s at a think tanky place. But my point is, you are supposed to be able to be the spouse of someone important, especially the wife, and have your own job, right? I think that was what the feminists wanted. So Ginny Thomas is targeted.
And the January 6 Select Committee, one of the members, I don’t know if it was Chairman Thompson or Liz Cheney or whoever said, basically we want to get to find out if Ginny Thomas’s activism or else might influence the court in any way. So basically, we’re using the wife to try to get to the husband. Okay, you see this? You see what’s going on? It’s from one spot to the other.
What you need to know is it is hunting people right along the path. And it’s conservatives. They’re moving along the path. OK, that’s the last four or five months.
How about the last 18 months? Of the 700 plus people that were arrested for January 6, some extraordinary number of them were arrested for something that was a misdemeanor, trespass, maybe. There are men that are held in the jails in Washington, D.C. And other ones for over a year for nonviolent crimes, misdemeanors that are targeted and focused on by the media and by the January 6 Select Committee and by others as insurrectionist. That’s just a lie.
Again, somebody pushes a cop, you got a problem. Somebody breaks a window, sure, you got a problem.
Somebody ushered into the capitol by the Capitol Police, thinking that it’s open and it’s okay. I’m not sure. Maybe you charge them with a misdemeanor, maybe. But you don’t say that they’re an insurrectionist, ruin their life and try to make them into something they’re not.
And you can say, oh, well, they’re just doing this to Trump. They’re not doing it to Trump, only. They’re doing it to people, American people whose families are wrecked because they’re sitting in jail. That’s the last 18 months.
If you pick your head up from your computer and say, I don’t know if the election was really done right, it seems like there’s problems. You will be deplatformed, you will be attacked, you will be mocked, ridiculed. You’ll be called the big lie, the big liars. This is what they’re doing. Now, go back five years.
If you happen to be a Trump person down the stretch in 2016, certainly they try to make you uncomfortable. They try to say, how can you support somebody like that? But then after he won. If you were Mike Flynn, you were targeted, clearly targeted now. If you were Donald Trump, you were clearly targeted with the Steele dossier and the British/American effort, the British/Clinton effort to take out to damage the Trump campaign and his presidency. And you had the Mueller Mueller. Mueller, The Russia. Russia Russia hoax targeting Americans. Manafort, Stone, on and on. Targeting. Why? Because they were center right? Because they were supporters of Donald Trump.
One of the two. I think they’re both related.
But the difference today is that we’re watching the power of big government being brought to bear. And I think we’re going to interview Allum Bokhari tomorrow from Breitbart about a piece he wrote a kind of think piece on how big tech is ramping up to influence 2022 elections. And what you need to know is it’s the narrative machine that is used to set the narrative, but it’s used now to hunt us, to target. It’s lawfare, but it’s also lawfare with a little oomph. Because it’s not just a lawsuit against you because you’re conservative or whatever. It’s now the Department of Justice and the January 6 Committee in prison and all the rest.
That’s the difference. What you need to know is the narrative machine. Big tech and big media is being backed up, heavy, by big government. Big government is in this, and they’re taking the narrative and they’re using it, and they’re hunting. They’re just hunting.
They’re hunting the opponents of the establishment effort, whether you call that liberals or not, Democrats or not, the establishment. That’s what’s happening in this country right now. That is what’s happening. That is the truth. They are hunting conservatives. The narrative machine is setting up why you should be able to do that, because if you’re a conservative or a Trump supporter, you’re so out of touch. You’re a white nationalist. You’re this, you’re that. You’re up, you’re down. And then you can use the government to go after these people. It’s happening around us right now. You can’t deny it. I don’t think you can deny the facts of it. I can’t read their minds, why they’re doing it. I just describe what they’re doing. All right, we got to take a break. When we come back, we’ll talk with Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network, especially about Justice Thomas and how he’s been targeted, oh, that’s the last one. Sorry I missed it.
Justice Thomas, this is the icing on the cake. Not only do they come after you and your family and everything else, they make it so unpleasant and untolerable and unpleasant that Justice Thomas announced he’s not going to teach a class at George Washington University. Justice Breyer is teaching at Harvard this year. This semester, coming up, Justice Thomas is supposed to teach a class he’s taught for years, I think five years, seven years at George Washington University School of Law. He’s not going to teach it because the faculty there objected, because the people object. The liberals objected because they don’t like the reversal of Roe v. Wade. Again, they’re not doing it to Breyer. They’re not doing it to liberals. They’re not doing it to establishment hacks that go along. They’re doing it to conservatives. They’re hunting. Okay.
Be right back. Ed Martin here on the Pro America Report, back in a moment.