*Previously Recorded by Phyllis Schlafly // November 2015*
Judicial activism has run amok, and judges are now legislating from the bench, completely without accountability or consequences. Republicans must look for guidance to the roots of our Party 160 years ago, when it rose from obscurity by criticizing the judicial activism of the infamous Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln was a political loser until he started hammering the popular Stephen Douglas about that ruling which tried to extend a pro-slavery view nationwide.
Stephen Douglas was a skilled attorney and orator. He tried to seek a middle ground between the pro-slavery federal court system and a populace that was increasingly fed up with judicial supremacy. Douglas finally lost his credibility when he could not give coherent answers to questions posed by Lincoln in Freeport, Illinois, about what the full impact of the Dred Scott decision would be.
When one branch of government oversteps its power, the remedy under our Constitution is for the other branches of government to push back or refuse to comply, as many presidents and Congresses have done throughout American history. In his first inaugural address, Abraham Lincoln repudiated the Dred Scott decision as wrong and declared that it was not binding on the other branches of government or on anyone who was not a party to that case.
The Republican Party platform of 1860 objected to how Democrats were imposing their agenda through use of “the Federal Courts [in matters] of a purely local interest.” By standing up against the abuse of power by federal courts, Republicans quickly became the majority party. Conservatives must take a lesson from our forefathers if we are to successfully battle this wave of judicial supremacy by the federal courts. We need legislators with solid backbones to hold these power-grabbing judges in line.