Did you know that alleged “child support” has nothing to do with supporting a child because the mother has no obligation to spend even one dollar of it on a child, and in many cases none of the “support” money ever gets to a child because it goes to fatten the payroll of the child-support bureaucracy? Did you know that a judge can order a man to reimburse the government for welfare money, which is falsely labeled “child support” and paid to the mother of a child to whom the man is not related?
Did you know that when a woman applying for welfare handouts lies about who is the father of her child, she is never prosecuted for perjury? Did you know that judges can refuse to accept DNA evidence proving that the man she accuses is not the father?
Did you know that when corporations can’t pay their debts, they can take bankruptcy, which means they pay off their debts for pennies on the dollar, but a man can never get an alleged “child support” debt forgiven or reduced, even if he is out of a job, penniless, homeless, medically incapacitated, incarcerated (justly or unjustly), can’t afford a lawyer, serving in our Armed Forces overseas, or never even owed the money in the first place?
These are among the injustices that the feminists and liberal legislators have inflicted on men. The sponsor of the federal law that says you can never get a support order reduced or forgiven was the former Democratic Senator from New Jersey and presidential candidate Bill Bradley. The law is called the Bradley Amendment.
Most Bradley law victims never come to national attention because the mainstream media follow the feminist propaganda line. But one egregious case did make the news this summer, and I’ll tell you about it tomorrow. It’s about a man who was kept in debtors’ prison for over a year for not paying support for a child who was not his own.